jump to navigation

Civic Journalism vs. Traditional Journalism…I didn’t know there was a difference… August 30, 2007

Posted by msjennabird in Jenna's Rants.
trackback

Ok…so most of my classes are not technology based, even though they realize that technology is what is driving this industry (media, journlaism). So my post might not have anything to do with helping us on our way to an idea, but it certainly might shed some light on the theoretical future of journalism. In my Mass Media & Political Communication class one of the instructors, who was a long time Wall Street Journal economic reporter, gave an interesting lecture on the implementation and rise of civic journalism. She defined civic journalism as an attempt to abandon the notion that citizens and journalists are merely spectators. Civic journalism, she asserted, believes that journalism has an obligation to the public to unload information that is in direct effect/affect with the community and that the way journalists perform their job has a direct impact on public life. In addition, civic journalism takes some of the agenda setting powers traditionally given to editors and puts it in the journalists hands a little more. She said she wasn’t quite sure she was on board with this whole “new” way of doing journalism, and wasn’t quite sure it was even ‘journalism,’ but that she was willing to give it a test run in the class room setting. It just so happens that this class is going to perform civic journalism.

I don’t know about anyone else, but I didn’t know there was really any other kind of journalism. I mean, I got into this whole game because I wanted to make a difference in society, but not with picket signs and rallies, more with words and facts . . .the Edward R. Murrow way. I wanted to inform society, community and make a better world. I don’t know what type of better world that would be, but I know that an informed society is a better one. Further more, I don’t know that I want to just throw facts and stories out there without any type of social conscience behind them. Is that even ethical? I know where this instructor is coming from, that unbiased reporting is the only way to accurately inform the public, but can you really live your life detached from emotional cause? Am I wrong in asserting that what we’ve been participating in all summer, and now into the fall semester is civic journalism? I was not aware that this was such a highly controversial topic. If I get nothing more out of this whole experience, I have definitely learned that the journalistic community is full of wedges and divides. But if that’s true, then how can we expect to bring people together with our craft?

Comments»

1. deene - September 1, 2007

So this doesn’t really have much to do with our project, but I feel strongly about this topic so here goes. . . I think that civic journalism doesn’t necessarily have to include inserting yourself into a cause or a situation in a way that makes you biased. The sad fact of the matter is that everyone, everywhere is biased in some way. Even if you strive your entire career to give everybody a fair shake, the problem remains. There are always more than two sides to a story, but usually you can only get, and are expected to get, two sides. So which sides do you choose to represent in your story? How do you decide what to cover? What are your motivations for covering some events and not others? The list goes on and on.

My point is that you can be amongst a group of people, like for example, cover a political campaign, and be fairly unbiased. Even if you’re interested in politics and you like the candidate you’re hanging with you still have an obligation to your readers and yourself to be truthful about your experience there. You can tell it however you want, but it has to be true and as undistorted as possible. Nobody says it has to just be some facts laced together in an article. I guess my point is that there’s room to be passionate about your work and still strive to be unbiased. Just be honest with yourself and you’ll know how to make it work.

And that’s my rant.

2. Anthony Venuti - September 12, 2008

“Out of the mouth of babes” distinctly speaks to the honesty, unbiased, unprogramed, but as it is…IS the talent that is honest journalism. Without the recognition of the lack of popular support of ones persona that exists now in journalism, you will never conquer it.

I have a radio show, Inpolitically Correct, and “Beyond Puke.” It’s thesis is cultural or the lack thereof…however, so much of what I need to set foundation is the media and it’s role and the effects downward can be attributed to them.

I’m an ex-con, publisher of Az Tourist News for 20 years….12 actually, but in buz 20…I

I can’t find anyone to talk to me, redemption is not sexy…and it is too much for either side to have to listen to my wisdom…with my history…small minds.

Thanks.

Tony Venuti, Publisher
Az Tourist News

3. Publieke opinie op internet: blogs & civic journalism - Spotlight Effect - de communicatieblog van Nederland - November 11, 2008

[...] gaat verder dan dat, heeft een doel en staat in dienst van het publiek; dit proces wordt ook wel civic journalism [...]